AntalphaAntalpha

Every answer you see can be traced back to its source.

Nina doesn't ask for blind trust. Every reply carries its sources, timestamps, and freshness — so you can judge its reliability at a glance. When data is insufficient, it tells you directly instead of making things up.

Trust State · At a Glance

Each reply carries a truth-telling badge at the top

The badge is calculated from the actual data sources used in this reply — not the model's self-assessment of confidence, but the objective state of the data. Click a badge to see what each state means:

Key data comes from real-time verification and sources captured at the same moment. Safe to reference.

Ex: BTC price $63,240 · from Hyperliquid · 3 seconds ago

Data is valid but not from the same moment (e.g., market closed, overnight offset, stale snapshot). Useful, but mind the time gap.

Ex: On-chain premium of a tokenized US stock · closing-offset · as of today's close

Some sources are available, others are missing. The conclusion is kept based on existing data, and uncovered gaps are named.

Ex: Wallet due diligence · PnL and signals available, contract-security data missing (2/3 sources)

There is no valid data to support a conclusion this time. Nina will simply say "insufficient to evaluate" instead of inventing a number.

Ex: On-chain data for an obscure token · source returned no data → "not enough data to evaluate"

This reply was not verified against real-time data; it is based on general knowledge. Please verify key facts yourself.

Ex: General mechanism explanation of a protocol · no real-time data invoked · verify recommended

Capability Tier · Why We Don't Name the Model

We show you the evidence, not the internal instructions

Many people ask "what model is behind this" or "what does the system prompt look like." Our answer is counter-intuitive: neither answers the question users really care about — "is this specific answer right?"

What powers Nina

A frontier reasoning model plus a real-time on-chain and market-data pipeline. We deliberately don't name specific models or versions — models may change as capabilities improve, but our promise to you stays the same: conclusions are grounded in verifiable data.

Why we don't expose the prompt

System prompts can't judge the reliability of an individual reply, and exposing them could let people bypass Nina's safeguards. Looking at the data source behind each conclusion is more useful — and safer — than seeing how we phrase instructions.

Data Sources · Laid Out

Where Nina's data comes from

Every source used for a conclusion is named in the Run Card along with its update cadence. Here is the full list:

SourceCoverageCadence
HyperliquidPerp market data · positions · fundingLive
Exchange Market DataCEX prices · candlesticks · order book · account balances (OKX / Binance…)Live
FMPUS stocks / tokenized US stocks technicals · financials · DCF valuationDaily EOD
DeBankOn-chain wallet balancesSnapshot
NansenSmart-money signals · wallet PnLSnapshot / Daily
GoPlusToken contract security scanSnapshot
MoralisOn-chain data such as holder concentrationSnapshot
DefiLlamaDeFi protocol TVL and yield dataDaily
Web SearchCurrent events · news contextLive

Capability Boundaries · What We Do and Don't Do

Nina is a trading and research partner, not an all-purpose assistant

What Nina does

  • Crypto trading and research: on-chain, perps / CEX, tokenized US stocks, Polymarket events
  • Gives conclusions along with the sources and risks behind them
  • Says "I don't know" when uncertain, and tells you what's missing

What Nina doesn't do

  • Doesn't act as an "ask me anything" all-purpose assistant
  • Doesn't recommend wealth-management or yield products
  • Doesn't guarantee returns or make price predictions

Limitations & Disclaimer

A Few Straight Facts

  • Data may be delayed or missing — when that happens, the badge will say so (🟡 delayed / 🟠 partial / 🔴 insufficient), with no cover-up.
  • Nina will say "I don't know" — that's by design, not a flaw. Better to say less than to make things up.
  • All content is not investment advice nor a price prediction — please make independent judgments based on your own risk tolerance.